
Tennessee alimony divorce case abstract after 21 years married.
Olivia May Marcel v. Brad Joseph Marcel

Tennessee Alimony Legal guidelines
The husband and spouse on this Espresso County, Tennessee, case have been married in 1999 and had two youngsters. The spouse started to have well being points in 2016 and was recognized with a number of coronary heart points. The spouse filed for divorce in 2019 and alleged inappropriate marital conduct. A trial was held, at which the spouse filed an announcement itemizing month-to-month bills at $3420 and earnings as zero. She anticipated social safety advantages, however requested $1500 per 30 days alimony. The husband acknowledged that the spouse had some medical points, however believed that she was in a position to work.
The husband produced an announcement exhibiting his gross earnings of about $5300, with take-home earnings of about $4300. He additionally confirmed that his bills have been about $4300. The husband labored for Nissan, which had just lately undergone a shutdown, at which period the husband was on unemployment. The trial court docket reviewed paychecks and concluded that the husband’s earnings was about $3400 per week. It set baby help based mostly upon that earnings. It additionally awarded the spouse $1500 per 30 days alimony in futuro. After some post-trial proceedings, the husband appealed to the Tennessee Court docket of Appeals. He argued that the trial court docket erred in awarded alimony because it did. The spouse pursued a separate difficulty, particularly, that the trial court docket erred in computing baby help based mostly upon solely 4 paychecks, when different earnings akin to bonuses had not been included.
The court docket first addressed the spouse’s difficulty and concluded that the trial court docket had erred. Wanting on the year-to-date numbers on the latest stub, the court docket famous that there have been prior funds for time beyond regulation, double time, and bonus. It additionally famous that the husband’s W-2 confirmed a a lot larger earnings within the earlier yr.
On this case involving variable earnings, the appeals court docket held that the trial court docket had erred in contemplating solely 4 paychecks, and remanded the case for a brand new computation of kid help.
The court docket then turned to the query of alimony, and it gave a quick dialogue of the kinds of alimony allowed in Tennessee. It recited the statutory components, and famous that a very powerful have been the spouse’s want and the husband’s capability to pay. The husband argued that solely transitional or rehabilitative alimony ought to have been allowed.
The trial court docket had made factual findings, during which it emphasised the 21-year size of the wedding and the spouse’s well being situations. After reviewing the proof, the Court docket of Appeals agreed with the decrease court docket {that a} grant of alimony in futuro was acceptable.
The appeals court docket went on to vacate the quantity of the award. Because the trial court docket had incorrectly computed the husband’s earnings, the case was remanded to compute alimony based mostly upon the brand new findings as to earnings.
For these causes, the Court docket of Appeals reversed and remanded.
No. M2021-00594-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2022).
See unique opinion for precise language. Authorized citations omitted.
To be taught extra, see Alimony Regulation in Tennessee, and our video, How is alimony determined in Tennessee?